Table of contents:
Video: Why Should A Man Provide For A Woman And Should He?
This topic has been relevant and controversial for a long time. Discussions are ongoing, and opinions and arguments are varied. But is this topic for discussion really so fruitful? It is no secret that men are mainly trying to get to the bottom of the truth, since the word "must" imposes many responsibilities on them, and they must be responsible not only for themselves and their actions, but also for the woman. So why should a man provide, if he should?
The content of the article
- 1 Excursion into history
- 2 Legislative level
- 3 Ethical side of the issue
An excursion into history
From ancient times, from the primitive community and almost to the Middle Ages, the man was the head of the family. This was the case on all continents, and later in all countries. Women had a lot of responsibilities, including cooking, and washing, and cleaning, and a vegetable garden, and cattle breeding, and raising children, but at the same time they had the very minimum of rights. Women, in principle, did not consider them a person and never asked about anything. While the man was the master and head of the family, he decided absolutely everything and never consulted with a woman.
Marriages were also contracted without the woman's consent, here the issue was resolved rather with her family, or rather with her father. Such traditions are still preserved in some Caucasian peoples, and for them it is completely normal and for women there is nothing surprising in this. But, if a woman does not decide anything and is not asked about anything, then many responsibilities to provide for the family fell on the shoulders of the man. And it was completely normal and there was nothing surprising about it.
Over time, women gradually began to receive, along with their obligations, some rights, but, of course, it was not immediately that men and women became equal in rights. The most interesting thing is that for a long time women did not really fight for rights, but why? Yes, because in fact everything was decided for her and for some it was really easier to live like that. Some peoples still live like this and support these traditions, and do not think to change anything. So why should a man provide for a woman, but because at one time, when he did not ask what she wanted, he forced her to live by his own rules. And we are responsible for those whom we have tamed, no matter how cruel it may sound to people.
So it turns out that this responsibility was inherited by men from their distant ancestors. Although now at the legislative level, men and women have become equal in rights and obligations, in life we are accustomed to the fact that the man in the family is in charge, that he decides everything. Until now, some men cannot accept and feel uncomfortable if a woman earns more than them.
As already mentioned above, at the legislative level, men and women have equal rights and obligations to each other. As far as family relations are concerned, spouses acquire the responsibilities of the family plan towards each other only after the official registration of the marriage. Only in this case they have rights and obligations related to family relationships.
Simple cohabitation and officially registered marriage are two different things from the point of view of the law. Therefore, many men are so afraid of the registry office, because in an open relationship they have much less responsibilities. But if the relationship is registered, then if something happens, the woman will be protected at the legislative level and will not get out of responsibility.
Ethical side of the issue3
Why should a man provide for a woman, and not why, and he does not owe anything to anyone, if he himself does not want it. Therefore, it is correct to ask the question whether he wants to provide and whether he has the opportunity. This will be a more correct wording of the question. Here you need to take into account not only the capabilities of a man, but also his upbringing and mentality, because in some countries the spouses have a separate budget and no one owes anything to anyone.
But in Russia it is so customary that a woman gets married, that is, stands behind her husband, behind his back, he becomes her support, protection and support, not only physically and morally, but also in material terms? And the tradition that the wife moves to her husband, of course, if possible, is still preserved. It turns out that a woman should follow her husband everywhere, support and listen to him in everything, but at the same time has no right to be financially dependent on him? In addition, if a woman sits at home with a baby and does not have the opportunity to work, then what to do? Shouldn't a husband take care of his child's mother and his wife, a different situation, if a wife lost her job and cannot find a decent job for a long time, shouldn't her husband support her? And what kind of love is this if they spare money for a loved one?
So, dear men, frankly speaking, no one owes anything to anyone, but there should be a conscience. Moreover, if you have chosen a life partner for yourself, is it really possible to regret the money for a loved one, especially if you have it.
Popular by topic
Rarely does a free person not use a tinder. But not everyone is lucky. In the article, advice is given by an experienced user of this dating service. Take it and write it down
What is passion? How is it different from love? Why does this very passion destroy families and make them go for treason? This will be discussed today
Is it true that a woman can be either smart or beautiful? And if so, what would a man prefer: intelligence or glossy appearance? We dispel myths and give answers to these questions in our article
It happens that girls ignore guys. But why do some ladies choose to ignore? What can cause a woman's silence and can it be fixed? Interesting? Then read on
What could be better than dinner with your family? Probably nothing. But we do know about 15 benefits of being alone. But there is also a downside - 15 cons of loneliness